12.9
56 %
89 %
Indicators in the Citation impact, Journal impact and Co‑publishing tabs are based on Web of Science publications only. Corresponding Scopus indicators can be found under the Scopus tab.
Overall Web of Science coverage for peer reviewed publications in this unit is poor, 56%.
Note that the coverage numbers for Web of Science and Scopus apply to publications in the KTH bibliometric database Bibmet. If a WoS-id or Scoupus-id from DiVA can not be matched in Bibmet, it does not count as covered.
The bibliometric indicators referred are based on publications registered in DiVA. Only publications from currently employed researchers at KTH are included. The rolling nature of this report means that it provides more of a current overview and less of a historic stable trend, since it excludes publications written by researchers that are no longer affiliated to KTH, but have been at some point in time.
Indicators in the Citation impact, Journal impact and Co‑publishing tabs are based on Web of Science publications only. Corresponding Scopus indicators can be found under the Scopus tab.
Publication data is available only after login.
| DiVA publication type | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | Publications | WoS coverage | Scopus coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article, peer review | 2.2 | 2.7 | 4.7 | 3.9 | 3.5 | 7.4 | 5.4 | 29.7 | 61.2% | 0.9 |
| Article, other | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 0.2 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 100.0% | 1.0 |
| Conference paper, peer review | 6.5 | 5.6 | 11.2 | 6.0 | 14.0 | 11.9 | 6.0 | 61.2 | 53.5% | 0.9 |
| Conference paper, other | 1.5 | 2.8 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 1.9 | 0.9 | NA | 11.1 | 9.0% | 0.1 |
| Anthology (editor) | NA | NA | 1.0 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 1.0 | 0.0% | 0.0 |
| Chapter in book | 1.1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 3.0 | 1.5 | NA | NA | 6.6 | 0.0% | 0.9 |
| Proceeding (editor) | 1.0 | 1.0 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 2.0 | 0.0% | 0.0 |
| Report | 0.7 | 0.5 | NA | NA | 0.7 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 3.8 | 0.0% | 0.0 |
| Doctoral thesis | 1.0 | NA | 1.0 | NA | 1.0 | NA | NA | 3.0 | 0.0% | 0.0 |
| Licentiate thesis | NA | NA | 1.0 | NA | 1.0 | NA | NA | 2.0 | 0.0% | 0.0 |
| Patent | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 0.3 | NA | 0.3 | 0.0% | 0.0 |
| DiVA publication type | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | Publications | WoS coverage | Scopus coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article, peer review | 5 | 5 | 8 | 10 | 9 | 15 | 13 | 65 | 56.9% | 1 |
| Article, other | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 1 | 2 | 3 | 100.0% | 1 |
| Conference paper, peer review | 11 | 11 | 24 | 15 | 25 | 28 | 14 | 128 | 56.2% | 1 |
| Conference paper, other | 3 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 | NA | 21 | 4.8% | 0 |
| Anthology (editor) | NA | NA | 1 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 1 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Chapter in book | 2 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 2 | NA | NA | 11 | 0.0% | 1 |
| Proceeding (editor) | 1 | 1 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 2 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Report | 2 | 1 | NA | NA | 2 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Doctoral thesis | 1 | NA | 1 | NA | 1 | NA | NA | 3 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Licentiate thesis | NA | NA | 1 | NA | 1 | NA | NA | 2 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Patent | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 1 | NA | 1 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Publication Year | Publications | Total Citations | Average Citations | Uncited publications | Share uncited |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 4.0 | 4.1 | 1.0 | 1.8 | 45.6% |
| 2015 | 6.8 | 28.9 | 4.2 | 2.6 | 37.7% |
| 2016 | 8.8 | 17.2 | 2.0 | 5.6 | 63.9% |
| 2017 | 4.4 | 3.5 | 0.8 | 2.7 | 61.5% |
| 2018 | 7.9 | 68.1 | 8.6 | 2.7 | 33.7% |
| Total | 31.9 | 121.9 | 3.8 | 15.4 | 48.2% |
| Publication years | Publications | Average Cf | Top 10% publications | Share Top 10% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-2016 | 5.0 | 2.23 | 1.3 | 26.6% |
| 2015-2017 | 4.1 | 2.51 | 1.3 | 32.4% |
| 2016-2018 | 3.9 | 1.52 | 1.0 | 25.6% |
| 2017-2019 | 8.7 | 1.02 | 1.2 | 14.4% |
| Total | 13.7 | 1.46 | 2.6 | 18.8% |
This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article, Proceedings paper, Review, Letter and Editorial.
Rows are based on at least 7 (full counted) publications with poor Web of Science coverage (at least 44.4%).
(DiVA publication types Article, peer review and Conference paper, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 7 (full counted) publications with poor Web of Science coverage (at least 35.1%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
| Publication years | Publications | Average Journal Cf | Publications in Top 20% journals | Share Top 20% journals |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-2016 | 5.0 | 1.06 | 0.0 | 0.0% |
| 2015-2017 | 4.1 | 1.13 | 0.2 | 4.9% |
| 2016-2018 | 3.9 | 1.43 | 1.9 | 49.7% |
| 2017-2019 | 8.7 | 1.25 | 3.5 | 39.8% |
| 2018-2020 | 12.4 | 1.21 | 4.0 | 32.0% |
| Total | 18.2 | 1.16 | 4.2 | 22.9% |
This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 7 (full counted) publications with poor Web of Science coverage (at least 35.1%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
| Publication years | Publications | Swedish non-university co-publications | Share Swedish non-university | International co-publications | Share international |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-2016 | 7 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% |
| 2015-2017 | 7 | 1 | 14.3% | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2016-2018 | 9 | 1 | 11.1% | 4 | 44.4% |
| 2017-2019 | 19 | 3 | 15.8% | 8 | 42.1% |
| 2018-2020 | 27 | 4 | 14.8% | 15 | 55.6% |
| Total | 37 | 5 | 13.5% | 16 | 43.2% |
This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 7 (full counted) publications with poor Web of Science coverage (at least 30.4%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
| Country | Publications | 1-10 auth | 11-50 auth | 51-200 auth | Over 200 auth | Publications (frac) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| China | 13 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3.9 |
| United States | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.9 |
| Germany | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.4 |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.2 |
| Switzerland | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.9 |
| France | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 |
| Italy | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 |
| Netherlands | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 |
| Singapore | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 |
| Ukraine | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.4 |
| India | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Turkey | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Belgium | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Canada | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Organization | Organization type | Country | Publications | 1-10 auth | 11-50 auth | 51-200 auth | Over 200 auth | Publications (frac) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scania AB | Company | Sweden | 11 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.8 |
| RISE - Research Institutes of Sweden | Institute | Sweden | 8 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3.3 |
| Ericsson | Company | Sweden | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.6 |
| Macau University of Science and Technology | University | China | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.6 |
| Xidian University | University | China | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.6 |
| Chalmers University of Technology | University | Sweden | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.9 |
| University of Electronic Science and Technology of China | University | China | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.9 |
| Volvo AB | Company | Sweden | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.9 |
| Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne (EPFL) | University | Switzerland | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.8 |
| University of York | University | United Kingdom | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.8 |
| Zenuity | Company | Sweden | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.7 |
| Mälardalen University College | University College | Sweden | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.7 |
| Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics | University | China | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.6 |
| Rolls-Royce Holdings plc | Company | United Kingdom | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.6 |
| Beijing Institute of Technology | University | China | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 |
| Dortmund University of Technology | University | Germany | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 |
| National University of Singapore | University | Singapore | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 |
| Saab AB | Company | Sweden | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 |
| Stanford University | University | United States | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 |
| Technical University of Berlin | University | Germany | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 |
| University of California, Berkeley | University | United States | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 |
| University of Trento | University | Italy | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 |
| Xilinx Inc | Company | United States | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 |
| National Aerospace University – “Kharkiv Aviation Institute” (KhAI) | University | Ukraine | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.4 |
| Umeå University | University | Sweden | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.4 |
| AF Technol AB | Company | Sweden | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Atlas Copco | Company | Sweden | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Atomic Energy and Alternative Energies Commission (CEA) | Other Public | France | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| École centrale d’électronique (ECE) | University Other | France | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Eindhoven University of Technology | University | Netherlands | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| GUANGXI NORMAL UNIVERSITY | University | China | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| HiQ AB | Company | Sweden | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Luleå University of Technology | University | Sweden | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Ministry of Education | Other Public | China | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Peking University | University | China | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Stevens Institute of Technology | University | United States | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| United States Army | Other Public | United States | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Semcon | Company | Sweden | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Ericsson | Company | India | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Aviation Industry Corporation of China (AVIC) | Company | China | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Georgia Institute of Technology | University | United States | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence (DFKI) | Institute | Germany | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Tianjin University | University | China | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Advanced Studies Europe in the Corporate Strategy, Marketing and Technical Directorate | Company | Netherlands | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| ARTEMIS Industry Association | Other | Netherlands | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Digital Catapult | Company | United Kingdom | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| French National Centre for Scientific Research | Other Public | France | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Imperial College London | University | United Kingdom | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Shanghai Jiao Tong University | University | China | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| University of Toulouse | University | France | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Izmir Yuksek Technology Institute | University | Turkey | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Karlsruhe Institute of Technology | University | Germany | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Research Center for Information Technology (FZI) | Institute | Germany | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Yale University | University | United States | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| ETH Zurich | University | Switzerland | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Ford Motor Company | Company | United States | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| MathWorks | Company | United States | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| McGill University | University | Canada | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications | University | China | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| NANJING UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY | University | China | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| University of Antwerp | University | Belgium | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology | University | China | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Autoliv | Company | Sweden | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Delphi Electronics & Safety | Company | Sweden | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Qamcom Research & Technology | Company | Sweden | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Volvo Car Corp | Company | Sweden | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Publication Year | Publications | Open Access publications | OA gold | OA hybrid | OA green | OA bronze | Not OA | Share OA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 13 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 8 | 38.5% |
| 2015 | 14 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 10 | 28.6% |
| 2016 | 29 | 14 | 3 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 15 | 48.3% |
| 2017 | 23 | 13 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 1 | 10 | 56.5% |
| 2018 | 30 | 14 | 4 | 1 | 8 | 1 | 16 | 46.7% |
| 2019 | 41 | 20 | 5 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 21 | 48.8% |
| 2020 | 24 | 14 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 10 | 58.3% |
| Total | 174 | 84 | 21 | 7 | 52 | 4 | 90 | 48.3% |
The Open Access type of the publications was fetched from the Unpaywall REST API. The method to determine the OA type is presented here.
In summary, the different OA types can be described as follows:
Gold: The full text has been found on a publisher website, in a journal that is fully OA.
Hybrid: The full text has been found on a publisher website, in a journal that is not fully OA.
Green: The full text has been found in an institutional repository, such as DiVA.
Bronze: The full text has been found on a publisher website but no OA license could be identified.
N.B.: This table is based on peer-reviewed publications for which Unpaywall could determine the OA type (necessary condition: have a DOI number). Unpaywall’s method is empirical and does not strictly equate to copyright license. As a consequence, the OA status of a given publication may vary with time — for example turning from “Not OA” to “Green” when a full text is added to DiVA.
| Publication Year | Publications | Total Citations | Average Citations | Uncited publications | Share uncited |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 7.5 | 32.4 | 4.3 | 2.3 | 31.0% |
| 2015 | 7.2 | 215.7 | 29.9 | 1.2 | 17.3% |
| 2016 | 12.9 | 116.6 | 9.1 | 2.5 | 19.4% |
| 2017 | 9.5 | 18.4 | 1.9 | 3.6 | 37.6% |
| 2018 | 15.5 | 88.5 | 5.7 | 4.4 | 28.4% |
| 2019 | 19.1 | 73.1 | 3.8 | 8.9 | 46.4% |
| 2020 | 10.6 | 7.6 | 0.7 | 8.0 | 75.3% |
| Total | 82.3 | 552.2 | 6.7 | 30.9 | 37.6% |
| Publication years | Publications | Average FWCI | Top 10% publications | Share Top 10% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-2016 | 24.0 | 1.61 | 3.8 | 16.0% |
| 2015-2017 | 24.1 | 1.68 | 3.8 | 15.9% |
| 2016-2018 | 31.8 | 1.05 | 3.6 | 11.3% |
| 2017-2019 | 36.2 | 1.10 | 3.9 | 10.7% |
| Total | 60.3 | 1.30 | 7.7 | 12.8% |
This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 54 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 83.6%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
| Publication years | Publications | Average SNIP | Publications in Top 20% journals | Share Top 20% journals |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-2016 | 14.0 | 1.42 | 7.1 | 50.6% |
| 2015-2017 | 16.8 | 1.16 | 6.5 | 38.6% |
| 2016-2018 | 21.2 | 1.10 | 6.5 | 30.9% |
| 2017-2019 | 27.5 | 1.21 | 7.3 | 26.5% |
| 2018-2020 | 29.0 | 1.32 | 9.7 | 33.4% |
| Total | 49.6 | 1.26 | 17.5 | 35.3% |
| Publication years | Publications | Corporate co-publications | Share corporate | International co-publications | Share international |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-2016 | 55 | 12 | 21.8% | 10 | 18.2% |
| 2015-2017 | 66 | 19 | 28.8% | 12 | 18.2% |
| 2016-2018 | 84 | 22 | 26.2% | 22 | 26.2% |
| 2017-2019 | 98 | 25 | 25.5% | 29 | 29.6% |
| 2018-2020 | 97 | 22 | 22.7% | 40 | 41.2% |
| Total | 176 | 42 | 23.9% | 53 | 30.1% |
This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 55 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 84.4%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
